Press Statement of S. Simranjit Singh Mann, President Shiromani Akali Dal (Amritsar)
Jalandhar, 12 March ( ) “Punjab occupies a unique place in the subcontinent’s geography and civilization. It is the frontier province of India, a central part of the Indus river basin, and the birthplace of the Sikh faith whose institutions have shaped the history of the region for centuries”.
In light of the visit of Shri Amit Shah to Punjab, it is necessary to place before the people of Punjab several fundamental concerns regarding current policies and ideological positions of the Bharatiya Janata Party.
These concerns relate to the ecological future of Punjab, the constitutional status of the Sikh religion, the militarization of Punjab’s frontier, and the broader civilizational vision of the Indian state.
1. Opposition to Inter-Basin Transfer of Indus Waters
Successive BJP election manifestos have committed the Government of India to the interlinking of rivers and the creation of a national water grid, which involves large-scale inter-basin transfers of water.
Punjab forms part of the Indus basin, whose rivers Indus, Jhelum, Chenab, the Ravi, Beas, and Sutlej function as a single hydrological system governed internationally through the Indus Waters Treaty.
Any diversion of these rivers toward non-basin regions such as Haryana, Rajasthan, or Delhi
threatens the ecological stability of the Punjab plains.
Punjab already faces one of the most severe groundwater crises in India. Large-scale inter-basin transfers would further destabilize groundwater recharge, river flows, and wetland ecosystems.
We therefore state clearly that diverting Indus basin waters away from Punjab is ecologically unsustainable and unacceptable, and we urge the Government of India
to desist from pursuing policies that weaken the hydrological integrity of the Ravi–Beas–Sutlej system complete Indus.
2. Sikh Identity Cannot Be Subsumed into “Sanatan Dharma”
The Constitution of India, under Article 25 Explanation II, places Sikhs within a legal formulation that includes Sikhs, Jains, and Buddhists under the category of Hindus for certain legal purposes.
This provision has long created concern within the Sikh nationality.
Sikh theology and scripture affirm a distinct spiritual path. The Guru Granth Sahib declares:
“I am not a Hindu, nor am I a Muslim; I belong to the One Lord.”
Similarly, Guru Gobind Singh in the Akal Ustat affirms devotion to the One beyond all sectarian categories.
These principles culminated in the formation of the Khalsa in 1699, which established the Sikh community as a distinct religious and political order.
Recent speeches by Shri Amit Shah describing Sikh Gurus as defenders of Sanatan Dharma misrepresent Sikh history and doctrine.
While the Gurus defended the freedom of conscience of all people, Sikhism is not a branch of Sanatan Dharma and cannot be subsumed within the Brahmanical framework of Vedas, Shastras, and Smritis.
We therefore affirm clearly that Sikhism is a distinct religion, and attempts to absorb Sikh identity into Sanatan Dharma are inconsistent with Sikh scripture, Sikh history, and the formation of the Khalsa.
3. Punjab Needs Peace, Not Permanent Militarization
Punjab lies on the frontier between India and Pakistan and has historically borne the consequences of military escalation between the two countries.
Wars and crises between the two states have repeatedly brought displacement, insecurity, and economic disruption to Punjab’s border districts.
Ideological formulations associated with figures such as Vinayak Damodar Savarkar and Madhav Sadashiv Golwalkar have framed national identity in terms of religious civilizational conflict.
Punjab has repeatedly paid the price of such geopolitical confrontation.Punjab’s future lies instead in peaceful regional cooperation and economic integration.
Projects such as the Turkmenistan–Afghanistan–Pakistan–India Pipeline and other regional energy corridors could transform the border economy through power generation, fertilizer production, pharmaceutical industries, and cross-border trade.
For Punjab, economic interdependence with neighbouring regions offers a path to peace and prosperity, whereas perpetual hostility only entrenches militarization along the frontier.
4. From Bharat to Begampura: A More Inclusive Vision
The name “Bharat” originates in ancient Sanskrit literature describing the legendary king Bharata within a social order structured by the varna system, in which political authority was associated with the Kshatriya class.
Such a conception inevitably reflects the hierarchical framework codified in texts such as the Manusmriti which was outright rejected by Sikhs.
In contrast, the Sikh and Bhakti traditions articulated radically egalitarian visions of society.
Bhagat Ravidas Maharaj whose hymns are included in the Guru Granth Sahib, described an ideal society called Begampura the city without sorrow, where there is no oppression, hierarchy, or exclusion.
The vision of Begampura represents a society based on equality and justice rather than inherited status.
For these reasons, the ideals of Begampura offer a more inclusive and humane philosophical foundation for the modern republic.
Conclusion
Punjab’s concerns are therefore clear:
• The Indus basin must not be destabilized through inter-basin water diversion.
• Sikh identity must be respected as a distinct religious tradition.
• Punjab’s frontier must become a zone of peace and economic cooperation rather than militarization.
• The egalitarian vision of Begampura offers a more inclusive moral horizon for the republic.
These issues concern the ecological stability, cultural autonomy, and long-term prosperity of Punjab.
They deserve serious attention during the visit of Shri Amit Shah to the state.